The quality of the Berkeley student body is unquestioned,
as is the quality of the university. For
example, a National Research Council analysis of U.S. universities concluded
that UC Berkeley has the largest number of highly ranked graduate programs in
the country. The analysis ranked doctoral programs, finding that 48 out of the
52 Berkeley programs evaluated were ranked within the top 10 nationally. UC Berkeley
has the second highest number of graduate programs with a ranking of #1: 16 out
of 52 reached top status—Harvard, for comparison, achieved this level in 19 of
its 52 ranked programs, while Stanford was
#1 in 11 of its 47 tested programs. UC Berkeley doctoral programs that
received a #1 ranking include Agricultural and Resource Economics,
Astrophysics, Chemistry, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Computer Science,
English, Epidemiology, German, Mathematics, Mechanical Engineering, Biochemistry
and Molecular Biology, Genetics, Genomics and Development, Physics, Plant
Biology, and Political Science.
UC Berkeley was also the #1 recipient of NSF
Graduate Research Fellowships between 2001 and 2010, with 1,333 awards. The
next closest schools: MIT
at 1,242 and Stanford at 1,070. Berkeley
faculty, alumni, and researchers have won an astonishing 71 Nobel Prizes
(including 28 alumni Nobel laureates), 9 Wolf Prizes, 7 Fields Medals, 15
Turing Awards, 45 MacArthur Fellowships, 20 Academy Awards, and 11 Pulitzer
Prizes. UC Berkeley researchers have discovered 16 chemical elements, 6 of them
in the periodic table – more than any other university.
But having a high-quality university nearby which
is unavailable to you due to size constraints, rising costs, and preferential
admission criteria for others didn’t seem like a palatable situation to some in
the audience. With more students
applying, with ever-higher credentials to vie for fewer total spots for
‘locals’, and no way to expand the university size – what next?
Asked about the new MOOC (Massive Open OnLine
Courses) craze, Jacobsen cited a Faculty Senate meeting (he was chair of the
Academic Senate last year) where some 280 folk (of the 1,500 faculty) showed up
(he mentioned that usually it is very hard to get a fifty member quorum). The Dean of the Law School was urging
adoption of the EdX program from Harvard, but the faculty group was resistant. The linchpin comment: someone asked the Dean
why he wasn’t urging the Law School to pioneer it first. His unfortunate reply was that “less rigorous
programs are the better place to start.”
The meeting apparently descended into a near riot. Our mature group was more restrained; clearly
this audience valued the on-campus experience of their education much as they
savored the Lair experience in the
Sierra Nevada mountains.
No comments:
Post a Comment