Tuesday, July 16, 2013

valuing a liberal education -- Part IV The Berkeley or "CAL" experience


Armed with insect repellant, but glad for the gradual cooling, a hundred of us had gathered (as reported in the last three posts)  in a small amphitheater on a hot, humid (90o Fahrenheit) Tuesday evening July 2nd at the Sierra Lair of the Bear Camp Gold near Pinecrest Lake. The central Valley was sweltering in a heat wave nearing 115O F, while Death Valley approached its all-time 134o F high. 
We anticipated a provocative presentation by a dark-matter, boson-chasing physicist, Dr. Bob Jacobsen, who inexplicably is the new Dean of Undergraduate Studies at Berkeley.  Entitled “Cal in this century: What does it take to be comprehensively excellent?” it proved to be a rollicking if somewhat disjoint discussion of the issues that UC Berkeley faces in the coming decades.
Jacobsen started by asking what people call the school.  He noted that if you were an undergrad at Cal, it is usually called ‘Cal’; if a graduate student, you probably know it as ‘Berkeley’ – the outside world more formally says ‘University of California at Berkeley, or UCB.’  Ninety percent of our crowd seemed to call it ‘Cal,’ including my wife who was both undergrad and grad there.
The audience, mostly Cal alumni and families, nonetheless posed questions and perspective widely applicable across America today.  One issue: “I am a third generation Cal grad; why can’t my kid, who has great grades, get admitted?” A second one: “Tuition costs seem to have gone nuts since I was there:” and a third: “They’re letting foreigners in to get their higher tuition fees.  Can I match the fees and get my kid in?”
The questions kept coming.  “Berkeley used to have great teachers – do they still?”  “Why did they build UC Merced instead of strengthening Berkeley?”  and “All the money seems to go for buildings.”  The crowd pressed on: “Why don’t you add classes and more students?” and “What’s the story on student loans?” followed by “Tell us about the university’s stance about on-Line education,” and “How does Berkeley compare to the other UC campuses?”
Strangely to me, there were no questions about the athletic programs, the lack of parking, or the graduate schools.  The answers, not always satisfying to the group, revealed a complexity I’d not often thought about, but they are issues that certainly bedevil higher education today.
Jacobsen did not wish to talk about the wider University of California (UC) system (there are ten total UC campuses); he said his primary (and nearly singular) focus was with Berkeley.  He did, however, make the strong point that the UC system is unique, since no other state university system desires that each campus exhibit autonomy and independent research leadership.  SUNY in New York has similar campus autonomy, but not the emphasis on independent research.
The UC family includes nearly 250,000 students, 20,000 faculty and researchers, and 210,000 total staff, plus 1.7 million living alumni.  There is no question – certainly with this crowd – that the Berkeley campus, established in 1868, is the flagship — envisioned as a "City of Learning.”
Today, Berkeley proudly and rightly views itself as the world's premier public university and a wellspring of innovation, occupying a 1,232 acre campus with a sylvan 178-acre central core in downtown Berkeley near Oakland, across the Bay from San Francisco.  Jacobsen, an avuncular jovial man, began with statistics, intoning that “Cal has 28,150 undergraduate students, more-or-less, a roughly constant number for the past forty years. There are about 6,350 graduate students as well, and some 85 buildings on campus.  The campus has about 70% of the student body living on-campus, versus a mere five percent some fifty years ago.“ [1]
To the question about ‘getting my kid in’ Jacobsen was unsympathetic, explaining that the campus is land-locked, completely built out.  Adding more students is totally impractical, which he described via examples of abortive attempts to add students, only to find they couldn’t register for needed classes, couldn’t find housing, etc.  Everyone seemed to know that there is virtually no parking on campus; we didn’t know that the ‘parking space for life’ granted to Nobel Laureates still had to be paid for by the Nobelist at the same rate as any other parking sticker.  The privilege just guarantees that piece of pavement cannot be used by someone else.


[1] Jacobsen’s precision if not his accuracy was quite good.  The website has slightly different numbers: 35,699 students as of Fall 2012, including 25,574 undergraduates and 10,125 pursuing graduate degrees.  

No comments:

Post a Comment